« Things worth reading: 17th January 2013 | Main | Things worth reading; 18th January 2013 »

January 17, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Greg Grimer

It is difficult to switch. Huge inertia, huge learning curve for senior managers who have lived comfortable lives for a couple of decades and know their bricks and mortar business and feel comfortable about their role in them. Lots of those types of people would have no useful job in a dot com equivalent as some of their knowledge and experience is now obsolete. You like tech and make an effort to master it and experiment, but think of your peer group of your age? Are they using and experimenting with blogs, twitter, social networks, syndicated media?

A senior chap from JP Morgan told me the other day that he never got any value from his LinkedIn profile and wondered why he bothered having a profile there. Where do you begin with that statement. Such a person cannot see the world changing around them. They cannot see obvious ways to leverage that database from a career perspective or just a market intelligence op

Recently a question came up at a not for profit members organisation as to whether they should allow their meetings to be shown on line to encourage higher attendance. The objection of "if you allow people to attend the meeting online they won't attend in the physical world", was raised at least twice.

My answer is that the meeting is for the members not the members for the meeting. If they prefer an online meeting then deliver it like that.

As Generation Y grow and age into more positions of influence, you will see more bank branches closing.

David Steed

The branches are closing because people are using them less and banking online, mobile, ATM in Post offices etc. What does the MOS want - banks to keep unprofitable low use branches open and post losses? Who is that helping?


The irony here is that even before the internet Banks were closing branches.

Back in the late '80s the bank I worked for closed some 90 branches out of a 200 branch network as they merged south west & south east regions moving jobs out of branches centralising operations and removing much of the point of a branch (other than cash transactions) as the authority of the "Manager" became non-existant. The branches of today are no more than retail shops: if you're a business or need specialist advice, you can't get that from a branch - an appointment will be made with said specialist, thus rendering the branch pointless.

Further demise of cheques & cash is coming as the industry attempts to standardise a trusted means of handling small transactions (think along the scale of mobile in Africa). Once that is complete (in a few years) the bank branch network will resembe the Post Office [i.e. a counter in another retail shop] or may be HMV...

If the bank wants branches to continue, it'll need customers (from both business & retail/personal sectors) that want to visit them to obtain products & services they need - does that make any synergies with the business model of a Dentist? :) Let's not forget that the readers of MOS represent the audience that is, IMHO, slow at changing to 'e' delivery, yet they too have their own financial advisers that they don't visit at the local bank branch.

It is the changing face of financial services that is the biggest threat to branches, which is not exclusively the internet effect.

Steven Lim

All business should ask themselves

Why does anyone want to conduct business/transaction face to face? i.e. at a branch or high street store or even the corner side street store.

Its mainly all about trust and whether you can get the business done. (immediate action and effect). It also allows the opportunity for negotiation of price. Convenience is secondary.

With present day British retail banking practices, the front office have lost most, if not all, authority or clearance to action any transaction at the bank. This has all been transferred to the back-office. Front office is mostly about form filling & paper pushing.

The new generation may have embraced the Internet for convenience, but does not allow one to negotiate a price. Perhaps they have lost the critical art of negotiation and conducting business face to face.

And from the business-side, embracing internet increasingly means getting into a price-war as there's less way to differentiate. This erodes margins. Perhaps this is why auction sites are still popular.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Twitter FSClub

    follow me on Twitter

    Your email address:

    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Search blog

    Amazon Digital Bank

    Financial Brand Editor's Choice

    Alex: The Finanser BlogAlex at the Financial Services Club
    Gaping Void: The Finanser BlogGaping Void's Hugh MacLeod worked with the Finanser
    Wordle: The Finanser Blog

    The Financial Brand


    Payments News - from Glenbrook Partners

    Payments RSS

    Tomorrow's Transactions blog