« Things worth reading: 24th January 2013 | Main | Things worth reading: 25th January 2013 »

January 24, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Alexander Peschkoff

The Oxford Dictionary defines "capitalism" as "an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state".

Which ones of those do you see as irrelevant, Chris - profit, private or state?

We all know who funds, for example, "democratic" elections. So, capitalism in that sense is dead from the point of view that "private owners" control (and always did...) the state too.

Chris Skinner

The Oxford Dictionary's definition is correct for 20th century world but needs updating: "a social, economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state, but with transparency due to changes prompted by technology, and particularly social media".

The latter means that irrational greed is curbed by social pressure of the 99%, which is the change I am expounding here.

Big Caper

It's like all things human. Eventually, it needs a reset and we start the cycle all over again. Each century in history shows us the same thing with the reactions varying between violence and discontent.

C Barry

It is the creeping in of socialism that will eventually disrupt equilibrium in the Capitalist economies. Social pressures are never applied equally - so those that profit more than others either through innovation, ingenuity, or cunning, will be penalized on separate scales. This will upset the balance in supply / demand / output / pricing etc...thereby bringing the entire system down to a lower level of performance over time.


There is no such thing as Free Market Capitalism, and pretty much never has been. The state has regulated and provided the physical and legal infrastructure that Capitalism requires to exist. Remember Obama's campaign comment that no-one actually built a business on their own?
Only the balance of influence between the public and the private changes. That pendelum will keep swinging, and that is a good thing.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Twitter FSClub

    follow me on Twitter

    Your email address:

    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Search blog

    Amazon Digital Bank

    Financial Brand Editor's Choice

    Alex: The Finanser BlogAlex at the Financial Services Club
    Gaping Void: The Finanser BlogGaping Void's Hugh MacLeod worked with the Finanser
    Wordle: The Finanser Blog

    The Financial Brand


    Payments News - from Glenbrook Partners

    Payments RSS

    Tomorrow's Transactions blog