« Things worth reading: 12th August 2011 | Main | The Finanser's Week: 8th August - 14th August 2011 »

August 12, 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jonathan Charley

All of which makes you wonder why anyone in the right mind would want to buy Lloyds Banking Group's 624 branches and legacy technology at a time when sales and service volumes in branches are declining.

Bob McDowall

The comparison with Google depends on what customers want from a bank- products or services.
The additional capital requirements for systemically important banks will encourage some banks to become smaller through disposal of what they consider non-core/high risk/unprofitable lines-of-business


Chris, shhh! Stop giving all the secrets away. lol

Iang ( ==> The 20th Century of Central Banking is over.)

Comparing Google/Apple with banks is comparing apple growers with builders. Yes, they both use wood...

Google/Apple are in high margin, high service businesses. Banks are in what could be approximately referred to as zero margin, zero service, zero innovation business.

Comparing to Paypal is more apt. Why can't banks compete at that level? Simple answer: regulation makes innovation impossible (see your own post of 16th if there is any doubt...). Paypal is new and only lightly regulated as a payment system, so isn't saddled with the old models.

Bob Meara

The question within the question in Chris' blog is "do banks continue to need branch networks?". The implied answer is "no". Reality, however suggests otherwise. It's not that "banks haven't let the paradigm shift happen" as Chris suggests, but consumers. Rare is the bank that has more than half its retail customer base enrolled in online banking - after more than a decade. Mobile banking enrollment numbers are smaller still. And, it's not for lack of trying.

Plenty of successful branchless banks exist, and enjoy the benefits of a lower cost base. But, they serve niche markets. Any bank wanting to serve a broader market segment will find itself needing branches.

Retail banks will continue to need branches for some time, albiet fewer of them. That's the easy answer. The real challenge is precisely how to design the future branch network and get there amidst all the other competing needs for capital.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Twitter FSClub

    follow me on Twitter

    Your email address:

    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Search blog

    Amazon Digital Bank

    Financial Brand Editor's Choice

    Alex: The Finanser BlogAlex at the Financial Services Club
    Gaping Void: The Finanser BlogGaping Void's Hugh MacLeod worked with the Finanser
    Wordle: The Finanser Blog

    The Financial Brand


    Payments News - from Glenbrook Partners

    Payments RSS

    Tomorrow's Transactions blog