Fascinating report in the FT this week about Global Brands, with the financial sector bouncing back the strongest of all. MasterCard and Visa led the financial pack, although Goldman Sachs saw a 25% growth in brand value over the last year ... I wonder how much they lost this year?
Anyways, considering banks had the worst results ever last year and lost all brand momentum, it’s no surprise I guess to see they’ve bounced back this year, and even beat beer as a sector for brand improvements:Year-on-year growth in 17 categoriesCategory Brand value growth (%)Financial Institutions 12%
Beer 10%
Technology 6%
Fast Food 1%
Retail -1%
Soft Drinks -1%
Mobile Networks -1%
Bottled Water -2%
Gaming Consoles -3%
Spirits -3%
Luxury -3%
Apparel -4%
Personal Care -4%
Coffee -6%
Insurance -7%
Cars -15%Source: Millward Brown Optimor (including data from BrandZ, Datamonitor and Bloomberg)
Strange how and why insurance is languishing down the bottom though ... maybe it's their lack of ability to cover Toyota's these days, which is why the car sector sits at rock bottom.
All in all, a big contrast between this and the Harris Interactive Reputation Survey I blogged about earlier this month ... so brands and reputation have nothing to do with each other, do they?
What surprised me is the list of the top 10 brands in our sector (doubleclick picture to enlarge):Wow! ICBC from China, the #1 bank brand in the world!
In fact, they’re the 11th best brand in the world, just behind Google and Apple:
A great report from the FT again, and well worth a read if you have the time ...
A "brand" IS an organization's reputation, so yes, they are connected.
Bank brands are climbing out of the toilet, so it's easy to achieve some improvement in their already dismal scores. Moving from a 1 to a 2 looks like a 100% gain...until you remember than it's a 100-point scale.
Posted by: Jeffry Pilcher | TheFinancialBrand.com | April 30, 2010 at 04:21 PM
Hey Jeffry
I was being the usual British sarcastic when I said that "brands and reputation have nothing to do with each other, do they?"
Thanks for the comment though and, as usual, we are still lovin' the Financial Brand,
Chris
Posted by: Chris Skinner | May 01, 2010 at 11:11 AM
I grasped your sarcasm :) I was continuing the point for whomever was wrestling with the question. Thanks for the love! - jp
Posted by: Jeffry Pilcher | TheFinancialBrand.com | May 01, 2010 at 05:04 PM